How FUT Revolutionized the Video Game Business Model

FIFA Ultimate Team, known as FUT, is more than a mode in EA Sports' FIFA series. It pioneered the "games as a service" model, transforming how video games are developed, monetized, and sustained. By blending engaging gameplay with innovative economics, FUT reshaped the industry, creating a blueprint for modern gaming.
Key Takeaways: FUT's Economic Legacy
* Shifted the industry from one-time sales to continuous revenue through microtransactions.
* Introduced a dynamic in-game economy with player packs and trading systems.
* Established ongoing player engagement through live content and weekly rewards.
* Influenced other games to adopt the "games as a service" model.
* Sparked debates on ethical monetization, shaping industry regulations.
Introduction: Shifting Paradigms in Gaming
FIFA Ultimate Team debuted in 2008 as a novel mode within FIFA 09, but its impact extended far beyond gameplay. It introduced a revolutionary business model that moved the industry from one-time game purchases to a "live service" framework, often called Games as a Service (GaaS). This shift allowed developers to generate ongoing revenue while keeping players engaged for years. How did FUT spearhead this transformation, and what lessons does it offer for the future of gaming?
Part 1: Traditional Business Models and the Emergence of FUT
The Conventional Game Sale Model
Historically, video games followed a simple model: players paid once to own a game, and developers earned no further revenue after the sale. This approach limited post-launch support, as updates or expansions were costly without additional income. Most games offered static experiences, with player engagement fading over time.
The Birth of FUT and Collectible Cards
FUT drew inspiration from physical trading cards, like those in sports or games such as Magic: The Gathering. Players could build virtual squads by collecting digital cards representing footballers, each with unique stats and abilities. This collectible system, paired with the ability to trade cards, created a dynamic in-game market. EA Sports recognized the need for sustained revenue and introduced microtransactions, allowing players to purchase "packs" of random cards, laying the foundation for a new economic model.
Comparing the traditional and FUT models highlights their differences. The traditional model relied on a single purchase, generating revenue only at launch. Player engagement was minimal after completion, with updates limited to occasional patches or paid expansions. In contrast, FUT introduced continuous revenue through pack purchases, sustained engagement via trading and squad-building, and frequent content updates to refresh the experience. This shift allowed EA to fund ongoing development while keeping players invested.
Part 2: FUT's Innovations and Their Impact on Revenue Generation
Player Packs and the In-Game Economy
FUT's core innovation was its player packs, virtual card packs purchased with real money or in-game currency. These packs offered randomized players, items, or boosts, creating a continuous revenue stream. The in-game transfer market, where players could buy or sell cards, added depth, encouraging strategic spending and trading to build competitive squads.
Squad Building Challenges (SBCs)
Squad Building Challenges required players to submit specific cards to earn rewards, such as rare players or packs. This system consumed cards, reducing market supply and driving demand for new packs. SBCs kept players engaged by offering creative challenges, ensuring constant interaction with the game's economy.
FUT Champions and Weekly Rewards
FUT Champions, a competitive mode, rewarded players with packs, coins, or exclusive cards based on weekly performance. This incentivized regular play, as top performers earned better rewards, encouraging investment in stronger squads. The mode deepened player commitment, blending skill-based competition with economic incentives.
Player Evolutions
Player Evolutions allowed users to upgrade cards by completing in-game objectives, revaluing less desirable players. This system kept players engaged by offering progression paths without requiring additional purchases, though many still bought packs to access high-potential cards for evolution.
These innovations created a system that consistently engaged players while encouraging spending, balancing accessibility with monetization.
Part 3: Challenges and Criticisms of the FUT Model
The Loot Box Debate and Pack Odds
FUT's randomized packs sparked controversy, with critics comparing them to gambling due to their "loot box" nature. Ethical and legal concerns arose, especially regarding younger players. EA eventually disclosed pack odds to address transparency demands, but debates persisted, influencing regulations in some regions.
Pay to Win Accusations
Critics argued FUT's model favored players who spent real money, creating a "pay to win" perception. While skill mattered, access to elite players through packs gave spenders an edge, frustrating some players and fueling discussions about fairness in gaming.
Market Economic Crises
FUT's in-game market faced challenges, such as Price Ranges, which capped card values to curb inflation, and #EAGATE, where allegations of insider trading damaged trust. These issues highlighted the difficulty of managing a complex digital economy while maintaining player satisfaction.
Balancing monetization with fairness remains a key challenge for FUT, as EA navigates player expectations and regulatory scrutiny.
Part 4: FUT's Influence on the Video Game Industry
Blueprint for Others

Read More about:   FC 26 Ultimate Team Deep Dive
FUT's success inspired other games, from sports titles like NBA 2K's MyTeam to non-sports games like Hearthstone. Publishers adopted FUT's mix of microtransactions, live content, and player engagement, making GaaS a dominant model across genres.
Shift in Developer Priorities
FUT pushed developers to prioritize live content, with regular updates like new SBCs or events keeping players engaged. This focus on continuous updates became an industry standard, as studios aimed to extend game lifespans and revenue.
The Future of Gaming Business Models
FUT's model suggests a future where AI and personalization enhance monetization. Tailored offers, dynamic challenges, and predictive analytics could deepen engagement, but ethical considerations will shape how far these systems go.
FUT set a benchmark for GaaS, proving games could be sustainable ecosystems rather than one-off products.
Conclusion: The Legacy of a Revolutionary Model
FUT transformed video games from static purchases to dynamic, revenue-generating services. Its blend of engaging gameplay, continuous updates, and innovative monetization made it a case study in digital economics. As EA and others refine this model, incorporating AI and addressing ethical concerns, FUT's influence will continue to shape gaming's future. It stands as a testament to how creative business models can redefine an industry.